The contract in your inbox was drafted for the other side.
A free contract reviewer for NDAs, MSAs and services agreements. Paste it and get it back clause by clause: what is standard, what is worth negotiating, and what you should not sign. No account, no email address.
Pick one and we add the checks that only bite under that law.
Not stored. Read in memory, then discarded.
Not logged. We record that a review ran, never what was in it.
Never trains a model. Read once, under commercial terms.
The places where the difference between market standard and one-sided is worth real money.
One fixed list, the same for everybody. Positions a document does not carry are left out rather than failed, and the review tells you which ones. It is a good list, and it is not your list: your team already knows the two or three terms it will never sign, and they are not on here.
Limitation of liability
Whether the cap is mutual, and whether the carve-outs leave anything inside it.
Indemnity
Who indemnifies whom, how wide the trigger is, and whether it sits under the cap.
Termination rights
Who can leave, on what notice, and whether both sides have the same exit.
Auto-renewal and the notice window
The renewal term, the notice period, and when your window to get out actually opens.
Payment terms and late payment
What triggers payment, and whether it can be withheld on somebody's approval.
Intellectual property and ownership of deliverables
What is assigned, and whether your pre-existing material is carved out of it.
Confidentiality duration and scope
How long it runs, which exceptions are there, and whether marking is required.
Residuals clause
Whether they may use what their people remember anyway, which guts the rest of it.
Non-compete, non-solicit and exclusivity
How long, where, and against what activity. A restraint unlimited on any one bites.
Data protection and security obligations
Breach notification windows, audit rights, and certifications you would be promising.
Governing law and dispute resolution
Which law, which forum, and whether the two of them point at the same place.
Warranties and service levels
Absolute promises such as error-free or uninterrupted, and what the only remedy is.
Change of control and assignment
Whether the contract can be handed to someone else, and whether that runs both ways.
Price increases
Whether increases are capped, and whether you can leave if you will not accept one.
Order of precedence
Which document wins when the order form, the schedules and the online terms disagree.
Terms incorporated by reference and unilateral amendment
Whether the terms can be changed without you, or live at a link somebody else edits.
Time bar on bringing claims
Whether a line in the boilerplate cuts your window to bring a claim down to months.
One thing we do not grade: the entire agreement clause. It is in almost every contract and not worth a rating, but it does mean anything promised in an email or on a call counts for nothing. If it matters, get it into the document.
We read your contract once, and then keep nothing.
Most contracts people want checked are somebody else's confidential paper. So the review is built to hold on to none of it.
The text goes into memory, the review comes back, and it is discarded. There is no file, no database row and no copy on disk.
Our logs record that a review happened and how long it took. They never contain your text, an excerpt, or a finding.
The review runs through an enterprise AI service under a commercial agreement. Your contract is not used to train anything and is not shared with anyone else.
There is no sign-up wall on this page and no form asking for your address before you see the result.
A general list found this much. Yours would find more.
This review graded your contract against a general list. In Karyalo you write your own positions once, per agreement type and per side, in plain English: the wording you ask for, the fallback you will accept, and the line you will not cross. Then every contract that arrives is graded against that, and the redline goes into the document where the clause is, rather than into a page you have to read and retype.
Ten contracts free. No card.
How do I review a contract before signing it?
Work clause by clause rather than reading it front to back. The clauses that decide your exposure are liability caps, indemnity, termination and notice, auto-renewal, payment terms, intellectual property ownership, confidentiality and governing law. For each one, ask what it obliges you to do, what happens if the other side does not perform, and how you get out. A clause that is missing matters as much as one that is unfavourable: no liability cap means unlimited liability.
What are the biggest red flags in a contract?
Unlimited or uncapped liability, an indemnity that runs one way only, automatic renewal with a short notice window buried in the term clause, termination rights that only the other side has, intellectual property assigned more broadly than the work being paid for, and a governing law and forum in a jurisdiction you could not realistically litigate in. Each of these is normal to see and each is negotiable.
Can AI review a contract accurately?
AI is reliable at the mechanical part of a first pass: finding whether a clause is present, reading what it actually says, and comparing it against a standard position. That is most of what a first read is for, and it is the part people skip when they are busy. It is not a substitute for a lawyer on anything high-value, unusual, or where the commercial context changes what a clause means. Treat the output as a list of things to ask about, not a verdict.
Is it safe to upload a contract to an online reviewer?
Ask what happens to the document. This one extracts the text in memory, reviews it, returns the result, and discards it: there is no file stored, no database row, and the logs record counts rather than content. Sending contract text to any AI service is still a disclosure, so check whether your own confidentiality obligations permit it before uploading something a client gave you.
This is not legal advice. It tells you what to ask about, not what to decide.